Three states demand the Trump administration to protect gender alteration procedures for children

The general prosecutors of three states filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Friday for trying to prohibit children from accessing gender alteration procedures.

President Donald Trump signed a Executive order At the end of January, “protect children from chemical and surgical mutilation.” Its objective is to restrict the “chemical and surgical” sex change procedures for minors.

“Throughout the country today, medical professionals mutilan and sterilize a growing number of impressionable children under the radical and false statement that adults can change the sex of a child through a series of irreversible medical interventions.” The Executive Order fixed. “This dangerous trend will be a stain in the history of our nation, and must end.”

Since then, local democratic Officials from all over the country have resisted, Arguing that Trump is trying to deprive vulnerable American citizens of a fundamental right. Nick Brown General Prosecutors of the state of Washington, Keith Ellison de Minnesota and Dan Rayfield from Oregon filed a lawsuit trying to argue that Trump’s order is not only “cruel”, but unconstitutional.

Washington Attorney Nick Brown condemned Trump’s executive order to block transgender surgeries for young people.

The transitioner criticizes the ‘pseudoscience’ trans that doctors said they would resolve their mental anguish: ‘It is charlatanería’

“The order is a cruel and unfounded side against transgender young people, their families and doctors and medical institutions that provide this critical care. It is an official statement of intolerance of The President That orders agencies to openly discriminate against vulnerable young people on the basis of their transgender and sex status, “reads demand.” It is also an abuse of shameless power. The Usurpe Order spending and legislative powers that belong exclusively to Congress, and seizes the historical police powers of the states to regulate the practice of medicine in violation of the tenth amendment. “

The demand He also opposed the same name of the executive order, arguing that the TER, “surgical mutilation” is “false and disgusting.”

The lawsuit also states that the Executive Order is “blatantly unconstitutional” because “violates the right to equal protection guaranteed by the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution because it stands out to a vulnerable group for abuse. It goes to restriction and medical criminalization medicine.

President Donald Trump signs Executive Orders at the Oval Office on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Anna MoneyMaker/Getty images)

Trump order restricting sex change procedures for minors in line with ‘Do not harm,’ says Doctor.

The lawsuit also argues that the Executive Order “violates the constitutional separation of the powers to usurp prerogatives of states by criminalizing crime the provision of safe, effective and necessary medical care. “

Attorney General Nick Brown in a press conference On Friday he described Trump’s executive order as “unpleasant” and “odious.”

Click here to get the Fox News application

“The order of this president is disgusting, it is disgusting, it is hateful, so we will always take measures against illegal behavior. But it has a special resonance due to the hatred behind this,” he said. “It promotes harassment and discrimination against people who are already marginalized. It runs the risk of their literal health and security and their suppliers. We are requesting a temporary restriction order to immediately stop the damage that is being done because it is treated of an emergency “