AI makes us dumb?

Researchers at the University of Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon Recently a study Here is the fact that the use of a generative AI affects the skills of critical thinking.

“Invalid technologies can result in the deterioration of cognitive faculties, which need to be protected, and the result is given.”

When people trust in a generative AI in the workplace, efforts are good enough to use the EU’s response is good enough to create, evaluate and analyze the EU’s response. If people intervened only when answers, they are deprived of regular opportunities to apply the judgments of workers, employees and apply cognitive muscles, and they are deprived of the exceptions and exceptions.

In other words, when we trust aI, we are deteriorating in solving problems when AI fails.

In this study, in the work of 319 people used by the generative AI per week, respondents were asked to share three samples of the generative EU (formulaic emails), for example); information (to explore a subject or summarize a long article); and advice (to make a graph from leadership or existing data). Then, if they practice critical thinking skills while performing the task, it allows you to make more effort to think critically if it uses a generative AI. For each task noted that the respondents, they also asked them to evaluate how confident in themselves, generation, and the results of the generation and the EU results.

36% of the participants said they were using critical thinking skills to reduce potential negative consequences from the AI. One participant said he was using Chatgpt to write the performance review, but he checked the AI ​​performance twice for the fear that he could accidentally stop him. Another respondent said that it should be edited by the AI ​​created emails, which will send it to his boss, the culture emphasizes the hierarchy and age – Faux would not commit rust. And in many cases, participants approved AI generated answers with more general web searches than sources such as YouTube and Wikipedia, perhaps by defeating the purpose of the AI ​​primarily.

To compensate the deficiencies of the employee’s generative EU, they must understand how these shortcomings happen. However, all participants were not familiar with AI’s limits.

“Potential low flow losses in Genay answers may motivate critical thinking, but even if the user consciously knows these losses,” he reads paper.

In fact, he said that the participants of the work participants confident in the EU are more critical of those who expressed their ability to their abilities.

Researchers show that the descendants of the descendants can weaken our ability to rely on research, descendants, generation, generation, generative AI instruments.