Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Democrats will probably “waste millions” of dollars fighting the president Donald Trump’s Executive orders and actions in the Court with little success to show, according to the University of California, Berkeley’s law professor John Yoo.
Trump “will have some of the best lawyers of the Nation who defend their orders and executive initiatives, and the Democrats will waste millions of dollars losing in court,” said Yoo, former assistant of the attached attorney general of the Office of Legal Advisor of the Department of the Department of justice. News Digital on Tuesday when asked if there are “law” efforts against Trump in his second administration.
“I hope Trump finally prevails in two thirds or more of his executive orders, but the Democrats can succeed in delaying them for about a year or so,” said Yoo.
The Trump administration has been affected by at least 54 demands in response to Trump’s orders and executive actions since its inauguration on January 20. Trump has signed at least 63 executive orders only Approximately three weeks In its administration, including 26 only on your first day.
The orders and executive actions are part of the Trump change of the federal government to align with its “First America” policies, including excessive government spending and poor management through the creation of the Government Efficiency Department (Doge) , prohibiting the biological men of the biological men competing in women’s sports and deporting thousands of illegal immigrants who flooded the nation during the Biden administration.
The administration of President Donald Trump has been beaten by dozens of demands in response to Trump’s orders and executive actions since its inauguration on January 20. (Ian Maule/Getty images)
The avalanche of demands occurs when the elected Democratic officials flee about the policies of the second Trump administration, especially the creation of Dux, which is in the midst of investigating several federal agencies to reduce fat, corruption and poor management of the funds.
A handful of democratic State General Prosecutors And other local leaders promised after Trump’s electoral victory to trigger a new resistance to his agenda, promising to fight him in court on the policies they considered harmful to the components. After its inauguration and their policies in force, the Democrats have amplified their rhetoric to fight Trump in the courts, and also to bring the fight to “the streets.”
“We are going to fight for him legally. We are going to fight the courts. We are going to fight against him in the streets,” said the leader of the representatives minority, Hakeem Jeffries, Dn.y., in January to fight against Trump’s policies.
“Our biggest weapon historically, for three years along with the Trump administration, has been the thug pulpit and a lot The inauguration of Trump.
Representative Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, said in a protest over Doge and his chair, Elon Musk, at the beginning of February, “We will be on your face, we will be in your A-are, and we will make sure that you understand how democracy looks, and this is not all.”
The dozen of cases arrive after Trump faced four criminal accusations, both at the state and federal level, in the interim of their first and second administration. Trump had criticized the cases, including the judgment and conviction of Manhattan, the case of Electoral Extortion of Georgia and the electoral case of former special lawyer Jack Smith and the case of classified documents, as examples of the Healthy Democratic Party The “law” against him in an effort to damage his possibilities of re -election in the 2024 cycle.
President Donald Trump has signed at least 63 executive orders only three weeks after his administration, including 26 only on his first day. (Seth Wenig/The Associated Press)
Yoo, when asked about the state of the law against Trump now that he has returned to the Oval office, said the president’s political enemies have changed the law to the launch of cases to link the administration in court.
“I think what is happening now is different from the law,” he said. “I think of the law as the deliberate use by the party in the power to prosecute their political opponents to affect the electoral results. Democrats at the federal and state level presented charges against Trump to expel him from the 2024 elections.”
“The demands against Trump are now the usual impulse and the stop of powers,” Yoo explained. “The Democrats are not personally attacking Trump and there are no elections. Instead, they are demanding Trump as president to stop their official policies.
Yoo said that the Republican party was also based on the courts on an effort to prevent the policies presented during the Obama era and the Biden Administration, even when President Barack Obama signed the Law on Health Care at Low Price in 2010, or His 2012 immigration policy denounced the action for children’s arrivals (DACA). Republicans also questioned the Biden Administration in the Court after President Biden tried to forgive student debt through executive action in 2022.
“Change is a clean play,” Yoo said about groups demanding several administrations’ executive actions or policies.
“What makes this also different from the law is that Trump now controls the Department of Justice,” he added, explaining that the Democrats will spend millions in cases, which will probably result in delays for many of Trump’s policies, But it will not completely frustrate most of them.
“The demands against Trump are now the usual impulse and the stop of the separation of powers,” said John Yoo. (Julia Nikhinson-Pool/Getty Images)
A handful of the more than 50 demands have turned out that the judges temporarily block orders, as at least three federal judges that issue preliminary judicial mandates against the Trump order that ends the citizenship of birth law.
The White House Press Secretary, Karoline Leavitt, was asked on Wednesday during the press information session if the administration believes that the courts have the authority to issue such mandates. Leavitt seemed echoing that the administration will be “claimed” in court as the cases break through the judicial system.
The White House Secretary, Karoline Leavitt, also seemed to think that the administration will be “claimed” in the Court as the cases break through the judicial system. (Evan Vucci/Associated Press)
“We believe that the actions of the court order issued by these judges, have no basis on the law and have no reason. And we will do it again, as the president said very clearly yesterday, comply with these orders. But it is the position of the administration That we will finally be claimed, and the executive actions of the president who took were completely within the law, “Leavitt said, before citing the” weapon weapon “of the judicial systems against Trump while he was in the campaign.
Click here to get the Fox News application
“We look forward to the day you can continue to implement your agenda,” he said. “And I would only add, it is our opinion that this is the Continuation of the Justice weapon that we have seen against President Trump. He fought for two years in the campaign, he won’t stop it now. ”
