Starmer says that US’s ‘stop’ is needed for the Ukraine Peace Agreement

Sir Keir Starmer has said that any Ukraine peace agreement would require a “top of the United States to” deter Russia to attack its neighbor again.

Speaking after a hurried meeting with European leaders in Paris, the prime minister repeated that he would consider displaying troops from the United Kingdom in Ukraine in case of a lasting peace agreement.

But he said that “a security guarantee of the United States was the only way to effectively dissuade Russia,” and promised to discuss the “key elements” of a peace agreement with the president of the United States, Donald Trump, when the couple It meets in Washington next week.

Sir Keir said Europe “would have to do more” to defend the continent against the “generational” security challenge that Russia represents.

European leaders gathered at the Elysée Palace to discuss concerns about the Trump administration decision to initiate peace conversations with Russia, which will begin in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday, alone.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said that kyiv did not know about the conversations and would not recognize any agreement made without his participation.

American officials have suggested that European nations would be consulted about peace conversations with Russia, but not directly involved in them.

The quickly organized summit in Paris also took place days after the US Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, said Europe would do it they have to be the main responsible for guaranteeing their own security in the future.

In his statement to journalists after Paris conversations, Sir Keir said that the United States “was not going to leave NATO”, but that it was “time to assume responsibility for our security, our continent.”

The Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said that transatlantic relations were in a “new stage”, and that the meeting had confirmed that the moment had arrived due to “a much greater capacity for Europe to defend itself.”

Sir Keir for the first time indicated his willingness to send British troops to Ukraine in an article for the Daily Telegraph. The United Kingdom’s contribution would be part of a multinational force to monitor the border between the territory controlled by the Ukrainian and Russian control.

But experts say that doing effectively would be a massive task that would require a great increase in defense spending.

Malcolm Chalmers, deputy director of the Royal United Services Institute, said that, unlike the UN peaceal different”.

“You need credible and well -armed forces, and not only do you need first -line forces, you need support forces and air forces, and so on,” he told the BBC. “That is a much bigger question.”

General serves Adrian Bradshaw, a former NATO commander, said: “This cannot be a symbolic force, it cannot be something that observes a bad behavior and remains on the sidelines.”

He told the world of BBC Radio 4 in one that he would have to do “effectively what NATO does in his own grass, really deter the aggression”, and that he would need to be “backed by a great strategy for the containment of Russia” that would make clear any future conflict would not be contained in Ukraine.

“Essentially, the force must be large enough to defeat an incursion,” he added.

The former Chief of the British army, Lord Dannatt, previously estimated that such force would need around 100,000 troops, with the United Kingdom contributing approximately two fifths.

“We have not simply put that available number,” he said on Saturday, he added that putting the military in form to play this role would have a considerable cost.

Currently, the United Kingdom spends about 2.3% of its total economic production in defense. The government has pledged to increase the 2.5%defense expense, but it has not said when this will be achieved.

Sir Keir previously said to journalists that the Government would establish a way to fulfill the 2.5% commitment once it ends its strategic defense review.

“Part of my message to our European allies is that we all have to intensify the capacity and expense and financing,” he said.

“That includes the United Kingdom, so I have made that commitment to spend more.”

Some European figures indicated their agreement with this.

Danish prime minister Mette Frederiksen said that Europe had to “intensify” defense spending and support for Ukraine, since “Russia is threatening all of Europe now, unfortunately”, while the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen.

Sir Keir also joined in Paris by the leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands, as well as the president of the European Council and the general secretary of the NATO Mark Rutte.

Before the meeting, European leaders had also expressed concern after Hegseth said he was not “unrealistic” to expect Ukraine The Nation in its 2022 large -scale 2022 invasion.

Heghseth also minimized the possibility that Ukraine joined the NATO of the Mutual Defense Alliance, something that Sir Keir has said that he was on an “irreversible” path towards.

General Sir Bradshaw pointed out these potential concessions to Russia, and said: “If we cannot return Ukraine to what was a sovereign nation before this war, we absolutely make it a lasting peace.”

No 10 confirmed Starmer’s trip to Washington earlier on Monday, after A minister said the United Kingdom could serve as a “bridge” between the United States and Europe..

Poland’s fang has already indicated that his nation would not send troops to Ukraine, but would continue to support it with military, financial and humanitarian help.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, meanwhile, told journalists after the Paris meeting to discuss the sending of troops to Ukraine today was “completely premature” and that he was “a little irritated” with the subject.

Profes “

The deployment of British troops would also require the approval of Parliament, something that the leader of Lib dem, Sir Ed Davey, said he was sure that “all sides of the camera will probably agree.”

Sir Keir spokesman said Parliament would be consulted “as appropriate”, but this was “advancing discussions” with other world leaders.

Meanwhile, the fight in the field in Ukraine continued during the weekend, with at least three civilians killed in Russian strikes on Sunday, according to local authorities.

Several areas of Ukraine are under an emergency blackout after attacks against energy infrastructure, while the Russian Ministry of Defense said it intercepted and destroyed 90 Ukrainian drones on Sunday night.