Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
After the ruling of a fourth judge that blocks his executive order that ends with the citizenship of birth law for the children of illegal immigrants, President Donald Trump He took social truth to say that founding parents are “turning in their graves” and that the 14th amendment was for former slaves, non -illegal.
“Our lawyers and judges have to be hard and protect the United States!” The president rebuked.
“The right of American citizenship of the 14th amendment never had anything to do with the ‘modern’ ‘crashers’ crashers, illegal immigrants Those who violate the law being in our country, had everything to give citizenship to former slaves, “he wrote.
“Our founding parents are ‘turning in their tombs” to the idea that our country can take us away,” he added. “No nation in the world has something like that.”
Trump freezes applications for migrants of the Biden era in fraud, national security concerns
The executive order of President Trump that ends with the birth citizenship of birth is receiving a backup copy of the Congress of the Border State Republicans and others. (Getty images)
In what has become perhaps its most controversial movement so far, Trump issued an executive order On his first day back in the Oval office to put an end to the practice of granting citizenship of law to the children of illegal immigrants.
The order, entitled “the meaning and value of American citizenship”, affirms that “the privilege of the United States citizenship does not automatically extend to people born in the United States” when that person’s parents are present illegally in the United States or when the presence of parents is legal but temporary.
Since signing the order, the demands have been submitted by Two dozen states and cities led by Democrat and several civil rights groups. Four judges of the Federal District have issued decisions temporarily blocking the order while it works through the long judicial process.
The last ruling, issued by the United States District Judge, Leo Sorokin, last week, said that “the Constitution confers the citizenship of birth rights widely, even to people within the described categories” in the order .
The people who protested the repression of illegal immigration of President Donald Trump broke out on Sunday on highway 101 in downtown Los Angeles, causing important delays, according to the police. (Fox 11 Los Angeles)
In response, several Republican states and America First legal They have submitted Amicus reports in favor of Trump’s order, arguing that it is completely constitutional and very within the original meaning of amendment 14 and in line with the previous decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States.
Click here for more immigration coverage
The 14th amendment was approved in 1868 and was designed to extend citizens to former African -American slaves. The amendment establishes that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to its jurisdiction, are citizens of the United States and the state in which they reside.”
After presenting two amicus writings in support of Trump’s order, the first vice president of the United States, Dan Epstein, told Fox News Digital that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction of the same” means that citizens must be due to their loyalty Politics to the United States, not to any foreign power or culture.
The Trump administrator reveals a list of posters and gangs to be designated terrorist organizations
Migrants trying to enter the United States illegally hurry a border wall, on March 21, 2024, demolishing Texas National Guards before they stop. (James Breeden for New York Post / Mega)
Epstein believes that Trump’s order will restore the constitutional principle that only those who are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, which is loyal, American respectful of the law, are citizens. He believes that the case will probably end in the Supreme Court, where he trusts that he will finally be confirmed.
Click here to get the Fox News application
“My expectation is that this is obvious. The law is clear, ‘subject to the jurisdiction of the same’ has to mean something,” he said. “So, it is not a very difficult question. It is a very clear question and the law has a very clear answer.”