Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Blake Lively representative accuses Justin Baldoni of systemic retaliation, seeks dismissal


Blake Lively’s The representative, Leslie Sloane, presented a motion on Thursday and requested to be dismissed from the modified demand of Justin Baldoni, according to the documents obtained by Fox News Digital.

Sloane accused Baldoni and her Wayfarer productions company to drag her already her company Vision Pr, Inc. to a “” Hume and reflects the exercise to distract from her own sexual harassment and systematic reprisal. “

Baldoni included Sloane and Vision Pr, Inc. in his defamation demand for $ 400 million presented in January, weeks after Lively, 37, has filed a federal lawsuit against her “ends with us”, co -starring sexual harassment on the set of the movie.

Blake Lively states that Justin Baldoni Legal Battle left her with ‘extreme anxiety’, her ‘traumatized’ children: documents

Blake Lively smiles ends with the red carpet of us.

Blake Lively representative Leslie Sloane requested a dismissal with prejudice to Justin Baldoni’s demand. (Charly triballeau/getty images)

“Because accusations of dispersion of the amended complaint cannot properly declare claims for civil extortion, defamation and false light, Mrs. Sloane and Vision PR, Inc. respectfully request that the Court dismisses the complaint amended to prejudices and lawyers of prizes .

Sloane said that Baldoni trivialized the “dispute over sexual harassment and reprisals trying to recharge it as a mere battle for the creative control of the film, ‘ends with us'”.

Blake Lively vs. Justin Baldoni: Everything to know

“Baldoni’s accusations about creative issues are irrelevant and revealing sexists,” they say. “Because Mrs. Lively, an executive producer of the film, is given the attention of offering information about the script, the closet and the edition, Baldoni exploits it as ‘tyrannical’ and ‘aggressive’, among other codified terms “

Blake Lively wears a floral dress without straps with Justin Baldoni with a pink suit

Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni have been in a round trip legislator for months. (Getty images)

“Wayfarer parts accuse Mrs. Sloane and Vision Pr, Inc. of extortion, but do not identify (and not) where or how the alleged extortion occurred, or how Mrs. Sloane or Vision PR, Inc. received anything from value because of that. “They also claim defamation claims without complying with the basic requirement of identifying or describing the statements they allege are defamatory.”

“Baldoni’s accusations about creative issues are irrelevant and vice versa.”

– Leslie Sloane’s dismissal motion

In addition to dismissing claims with prejudice, he requested the fees and costs of lawyers.

Sloane, and Baldoni representatives, did not immediately respond to the request for Fox News Digital comments.

Detailed allegations animated sexual harassmentretaliation, intentional affliction of emotional anguish, negligence and more made by Baldoni and film producer Jamey Heath in a complaint presented for the first time before the California Civil Rights Department on December 20 and later in the Federal Court on the 31st of December.

How are you reading? Click here for more entertainment news

The same day that Lively filed his federal lawsuit, Baldoni filed a lawsuit of $ 250 million against the New York Times for a December article on the alleged discredit campaign that Baldoni tried to run against his co -star.

Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively on the set of "It ends with us"

Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively starred in the film based on Colleen Hoover’s novel. (Images José Pérez/Bauer-Griffin/GC)

Click here to register in the entertainment bulletin

Weeks later, Baldoni then appointed Lively and Reynolds in a separate Demand demand for $ 400 million in which he accused Hollywood’s power couple trying to kidnap “ends with us” and create their own narrative.

Legal teams from Baldoni and Lively They were in the Federal Court recently, and a judge ordered that the professional conduct of New York, which limit talking to the press follow.

None of the parties can make statements to the press that have a “substantial probability” to harm a jury. However, legal teams may defend their clients in the media against advertising not created by any of the sides in the dispute.

Click here to get the Fox News application



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *