Blake Lively slams “disrespect” Justin Baldoni for victims of sexual harassment in the debate about privacy

In a new submission obtained Us every week, Blake Lively shoots back after being charged with the effort to “prevent the public” to see “relevant evidence” in her legal struggle against Justin Baldoni.

After the recent request of Lively o Improved – who asked for the provision of “the eyes of the prosecutor only” to prevent some information about the eye of the public – Baldoni’s legal team to submit a letter Judge Lewis Liman on Tuesday, February 25th.

“Given how actively the living parties promoted and agreed to Mrs. Livela’s demands in the media, we are surprised to learn how to vehemently wants to prevent the public from accessing material and relevant evidence,” lawyer Mitchell Schuster wrote in a letter, per Period.

Schuster accused Lively (37 years) and her camp “routinely”, who tried to “rehabilitate her tilted image with courageous statements about the press”, claiming that “she has already published alleged details of” harassment “” It ends with us.

Related: Blake Lively says she got “violent” news in the middle of Justin Baldoni

Blake Lively reportedly asked for the protective rules in light and ends with an ongoing legal battle of American director Justin Baldoni. Lively, 37 years old and husband Ryan Reynolds submitted a letter to the judge on Thursday 20 February, he can confirm the US Weekly, ask for a stronger protective order than the one that was awarded. (Live (…)

“Mrs. Lively lacks the beliefs of” good faith “that there is some information about such” personally sensitive nature “, that their publication would unnecessarily violate (its) privacy rights,” the letter continued.

Schuster claimed that Lively’s request to strengthen the initial protection order, which was previously granted in a legal battle, is “guaranteed”, claims that “the living parties have not explained and cannot explain why” the court’s protection order is “insufficient”. (The letter also overwhelmed Ryan Reynoldsthat appeared in the “planned parody” of the dispute during Saturday night liveLast 50. The anniversary of the special.)

In response to that Lively’s lawyer Michael Gottlieb On Tuesday he issued his own four -page letter and called on “heartless ignoring and disrespect for a woman who advocates the most basic protection in the workplace from sexual harassment” that the Baldoni and those on his side. To a letter, obtained OurThe protective order is “standard and is expected even in the most important civic dispute”.

Gottlieb also claimed that “some online content creators” “line” Parrot line “of the Wayfarer party” with “misleading accusations” regarding Livela’s intentions.

“The paths from Mischaracterization, which the opposition has accepted through this Echo Chamber, provides sufficient justification of the Protective Code, which determines adequate protection for third -party privacy interests,” the letter continued.

Related: Justin Baldoni’s lawyer responds to the request for the order of the Roubl Lively

Attorney Justin Baldoni Bryan Freedman forcibly responded to the request of Blake Lively about the order of Roublk in the ongoing legal case of the former costume surrounding his filming, ending in our country. “The irony is not lost on anyone that Mrs. Lively is so fossilized by the truth that she has moved to the gag,” Freedman (…)

He named the Baldoni – which was directed with her and played after It ends with us – in December 2024 A court lawsuit of sexual harassmentHe claimed that the Baldoni supported the “enemy working environment”. At the beginning of this month, she changed her complaint and described in detail the “emotional impact” of the ongoing legal battle.

Baldoni denied the allegation of Lively’s harassment before the lodging of his own lawsuits The New York Times – The output that was originally published by Lively’s accusation – and against live, Reynolds and its journalist. The Times She woke up her report recently Call “inaccuracies” In the legal submissions of the Baldoni. Live and Reynolds continue to deny Baldoni’s defamation for their parts. (At the beginning of this month, Lively’s publicist filed a proposal to remove from the Baldoni.)

Initial hearing took place on February 3, during which Judge Liman noted Test date – set to March 2026 – it could move up if the details of their case continue to be “judicial in the press”.