La Times will label ideas with AI-powered ‘Bias Meter’

This Los Angeles Times The company’s billionaire owner has seen better days because of a 150-year-old organization continues to buy the ball. Floor waves and editorial intervention Soon Patrick-ShiongA vocal Trump fans did a tank, and now the owner trusted in the EI and as a result, the newspaper saw the newspaper as a panacea. Soon-Shiong announced a biased counter in AI who now labeled articles based on the interpretation of the political trends of an algorithm this week.

New tags include “left, center left, central, center right or right” and are determined by a start called particle built by past Twitter engineers. The EU will be a part called “ViewSpoints” equipped with starting confusion, which will show alternative meetings to those who appear in an article.

These new AI products are not only for opinion tracks, not for an expression that is accepted, a “articles that offer ideas related to the issue” Guardian. Feedback-oriented articles will be clearer than direct news reports with the new “sounds” label. Standard News articles will not cover AI features.

The sounds and concepts button live now@latimes. Try it. Now hear the sound and perspective on all sides, you can be seen and read more Echo Chamber. Thank you for our Talented Content Management Program team working on this Graphene Platform pic.twitter.com/hsld5dkinz

– Dr. Pat Soon-Shiong (@drpatsoonshiong) 3 March 2025

Trust in the media is neatly low and it’s worth practicing to see how the tide can turn. However, a little ironic is a little ironic that this soon-shiong is trying to improve confidence in the media while interfering repeatedly. The billionaire, after sharing a piece of opinion in 2024, after the original author appeared in the original author, after Soon-Kennedy JR, after-shiong, intervened in one article about one of his friends entered a change over a dog attack. The winner of the billionaire, decisions of a second guess of journalists and the friends of journalists are investigated in person, “confidence” is inconsistent.

Times’ Editorial Union is not against the indication of alternative ideas against an article, saying that AI is not a way for it. The AI ​​generated points will not be investigated by the editors and of course, the AI ​​models continue to get information and key questions (in the nominees since the wrong Oscars, Chatgpt). Already Guardian Some contradictory points offered through the EU say the article is also shown. “The money for this effort could be directed to another: Since 2021,” said Legimes Gildiya Vice President Matt Hamilton.

Seems to be inevitable that we went right to the point where the Internet encounters The EU-created, false academic writing, later “Knowledge”, was cemented “Knowledge” in case of training for future models. How much this will end in alternative viewpoints Time Articles?

Capture, it should be noted, articles in the journalism industry are collapsed and regurgitate in ChatBot in Chatbot and overthrows them by regurgitation in ChatBot by regurgitation in ChatBot. When New York Times Workers strike last year during labor negotiations, the confusion offered CEO Aravind Srinivas Provide AI tools Suggested that they could replace them. It will not be surprised to see that it is expanding the use of AI to write all articles in Song-Siong, showing similar overthrows for their employees.

Other news organizations tested in small and fine ways with AI. Now the Washington Post automaticizes the basic points of the above articles and surfaces automatically. Jeff Bezos Jeff Bezos, the owner of this newspaper, more controls and “free markets” and “Free Markets” section, live in their own confusion. This Post Lost hundreds of thousands of subscribers since Bezos, Kamala Harris, who confirmed the newspaper again Bled Subscribers after changes in the idea section.

This, a few years ago, the Likes of the Bezos came out of the internet and became kind of good billionaires while keeping the inheritance media. We were naive to believe that. This will always be the problem of news organizations belonging to non-conflicting interests. Today, the name of the game is gratifying President Trump, so it does not go to Amazon, and perhaps some new contracts of blue origin.