Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Embracing the head of the head of the face, the AI’s “Yes-Men” of the Servers “


The founders of the AI ​​have a reputation to make bold claims of technology, especially the potential of technology to change science. However, Thomas Wolf, who embraced the co-founder and chief science officer of the face, is more measured.

One Published to Essay X On Thursday, Wolf, AI’s AI research said AI was afraid of being “Yes-Men”, where there is a progress. The existing type of AI, which is able to solve the existing AI development paradigm, is not given a company that is capable of solving a creative problem – the solution of the problem of solving Nobel gifts.

“When people say that there are good students, Newton or Einstein, the best 10% of the students,” Wolf “wrote” Wolf “, we need a system that can only know all the answers.”

Wolf’s allegations, in one of the Openai CEO SAM SAM Altman’s Essay at the beginning of this year “Super Development” EU “can be massacred by scientific discovery,” he said. Similarly, anthropic CEO Dario predicted that AI could do Help shape treatments for most of the cancer.

Today, the wolf problem with the AI ​​- and where the technology is thinking of the title, it does not create a new information. As most of the Internet, as we understand the EU, he said that the gaps between people who are currently saying mostly.

Some AI specialists, including Former Google Engineer Francois CholletHe expressed similar views, claiming that the EU could remember the way of thinking, “New justification is likely to create a new justification.”

Wolf thinks that the AI ​​laboratories are based on “Very Obedient Students” – are not scientific revolutionaries in any sense of the phrase. Today, this is not encouraged to answer the opinions that can potentially be potentially against its training information, to answer this well-known questions.

“To create an Einstein in a data center, we do not need a system that knows all the answers, but we do not need a system that cannot dare to ask or ask. “Who writes that if everyone is wrong about it?” When all textbooks, experts and general knowledge offer otherwise. “

The wolf thinks that “The appraisal crisis“In AI, it is guilty for this subtle situation. The AI ​​point to the criteria used to measure system improvements, most of them are clear, discovered and” close “answers.

As a solution, Wolf offers that the AI ​​industry has increased “knowledge and reasoning”, which can explain that “brave falsification approaches” is based on “small instructions”, explaining the “clear question”.

The trick will understand that this event will be seen, the monster. But he thinks it may be worth striving.

“(T) The most important aspects of science (the most important aspects are the ability to question questions and even learn.” We do not need a + (AI) student who can respond to general knowledge.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *