Hacked Health Company HCRG, a report that violates the information violation of the journalist, asked the Charter of the British Court

Independent Cyberian journalist in the United States refused to comply with Britain’s ordered command, which is wanted after reporting the UK’s Private Health Gianty HCRG in the last cyberattack.

Pinsent Masons, who served on the name of the February 28 court HCRG, demanded the “lowering” of the Pinsent Masons, DataCheses.Net two articles referenced Ransomware attack in HCRG.

TechCrunch’s report to DataBreaches.NET notification to Databreaches.Net in the London’s Court of Justice “HCRG by HCRG” HCRG has prevented the opening of hidden data during the recent Ransomware cyberhare, “he said.

According to the company, the information provided that the information is given, the court disrespects the trial from the area, which can be arrested in the context of the court, “can be arrested, criminal or seize your assets.”

Databreaches.net refused to remove posts by a journalist working in the background of Pseunoham, and also Details of the instruction on a blog post on Wednesday.

Referring to a letter of opposition, Legal Covington and Burling, Batabreaches.Net was not subjected to the jurisdiction of the British order and reports that the report was legalized to be legalized.

The opposition, the text of the court decision was not specially called or referred to specific articles in question, he said.

Legal threats and demanding have not unusual In cideration journalism, since the reporting, often companies have to reveal the information they did not want to be open. However, and legal requirements are rarely afraid of rare risks or legitimate sites.

Expression details suggest a rare idea of ​​how to use it to give legal requirements to delete the broadcasting stories in the UK laws.

The letter of the law firm also confirms that HCRG attacks on “Ransomware cyber.”

Previously, HCRG, one of the virgin care and one of the largest independent health providers in the UK, was approved on February 20 Investigates a cyberries event Medusa Ransomware gang, saying two terabytes of information from the company’s systems, claimed responsibility for violation. HCRG has more than 5,000 employees and covers half a million patients throughout the United Kingdom.

TechCrunch, HCRG spokesman Alison Klabacher said: “We can confirm that any information obtained by the Criminal Group is aimed at minimizing the impact of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic.”

“We are investigating the incident with the support of foreign experts, and we will notify everyone affected by our investigation,” We have added HCRG’s spokesman.

A spokesperson for Pinent Masons, the law firm representing HCRG, did not comment on the time it was published.

According to the legal student, Pinsent Mason has two articles that have received a loan for the HCRG cyberattack of the Medusa Ransomware network and threatened to publish information and sensitive health information if HCRG did not give a ransom. The network has published several screenshots of data stolen on the dark website leak website as evidence of its claims.

Posts published in databreaches.net contain most of the same information Techcrunch and other stores were confirmed independently and reported.

According to the opposition, Pincesent Masons sent the Domaine Registrar of the Domaine.net, which in turn, warned that the web domain for data will be suspended. Then the domain registration was reverse the course and refused to postpone databreaches.net.

HCRG has not explicitly explicit violations on the website. The opposition said Their blog on Wednesday In the absence of an update from HCRG, most of the details on HCRG’s Cyberattack are covered by independent journalists, including the Kibers-Cibritury Blog SuspiciousHCRG broke new details about Cyberattack.

Opposition, opposition, otherwise, otherwise, “the confidence would be affected by the affected,” and “” and “” and “” and “” and “in Britain or elsewhere can open the door to the widespread censorship of journalists.”

“Journalists who have any connection to the UK can be sent by e-mail that require the information about the stolen information from the British bodies or to provide any information that the Britain’s company is stolen,” he said.