Democratic strategists call DeM legislators to interrupt Trump’s speech

Democratic strategists argue that it would have been better for democratic legislators to omit the joint discourse of President Donald Trump To Congress to cause interruptions, which since then have caused tensions with the leadership of the party.

“I think it would have been smarter boycott the speech,” said Jim Manley, a Democratic political strategist, Fox News Digital. “Appear gave Trump legitimacy that he doesn’t deserve.”

He asked if he thought The Democrats The president’s speech was a good strategy, said Andrew Bates, who served as a white house secretary for former President Joe Biden, “no” from the White House of the White House.

“The protests preached to the choir, when we need to grow the congregation, as Slotkin (Democratic Michigan Sen. Elissa) did when he said that Republicans will make you pay more” in each part of your life “to reduce taxes for the rich,” Bates said.

Democrats privately rebuke Trump’s party members during the speech to Congress: Report

According to the reports, the leadership of the democratic chamber is “very unhappy” with the interruptions made by the legislators during the speech, which included shouting and sustaining the palettes that read “musk robberies”, and asked several of them to attend a “meeting of JUSES” to discuss their behavior, a Chamber Democrat told Axios.

“I did not think that the democratic reaction in the room was very good. It simply contributed to theatricality,” Brad Bannon, president of Bannon Communications Research, a political consulting firm, in an interview, told Fox. “No one can beat Trump in Theatics. I’m sorry, I love my Democrats of Congress, but when it comes to theatricality, they do not approach.”

“It would have made more sense, in my opinion, let Trump’s words soak and not act as a distraction with the lies and falsehoods he said,” Bannon added. “So I don’t think the democratic reaction in the room was good.”

A strategist shared with Fox that they saw private data demonstrating that voters did not like protests.

Fetterman dismayed by the Democrats who discouraged the “moving moment” in Trump’s speech

The representative to Green, D-Texas, rose during the direction of Trump and He refused to sitWhat leads to the speaker Mike Johnson, republican of La-La., Ordering the sergeant in the arms that remove him from the camera.

The Democratic strategist David Axelrod told Politico that Green’s protest “obtained many attaboys from the base,” but did not resonate with most Americans.

“But with many other Americans, and not just Republicans, it was not more attractive than (the representatives of the Republican Party) Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Bobert Heckling Biden,” Axelrod said in an interview. “It is simply not particularly useful.”

Democrats were also criticized for Not standing While the president presented DJ Daniel, a 13 -year -old cancer survivor, during the joint speech.

“You know, that is something very individual. And there are not many other things that we can focus, as I think?” Senator Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, said when asked why the Democratic members did not defend Daniel. “The word ‘betrayal’ comes to mind regarding the president.”

Another Democrat, Senator Peter Welch, D-Vt., Told Fox News Digital that “it was a moving story”, but that “what Trump left out, of course, is that he is reducing the research for cancer, which is quite bad.”

Click here to get the Fox News application

However, Senator John Fetterman, D-Pa., Broke with his party on the subject.

“I don’t know why we can’t celebrate completely,” Fetterman told Nicholas Ballalasy for Fox. “I mean, I have a 13 -year -old boy, and thank God he has never had cancer, but I think it’s something we can all celebrate there. And I think it was a moving moment. And, as I said, that is part of the best of US experience.”