Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
EXCLUSIVE – He House Republican Party The campaign committee is pointing to the Democrats of Congress for voting against a measure to finance the federal government until September 30 and avoid a closure of the government at the end of this week.
The National Committee of the Republican Congress is launching digital ads against 35 Democrats of the House of Representatives who may face challenging or competitive careers in the intermediate people of 2026, when the Republican Party aims to defend its fragile majority in the Chamber.
The places, shared first with Fox News on Wednesday morning, will rise hours after the Chamber, almost completely in the lines of the party, voted 217-213 to approve a bill made to the Republicans that reduces the non-defense expense by approximately $ 13 billion, increases the defense expenditure for around $ 6 billion and gives the president. Donald Trump More margin of maneuver on how to spend the funds.
Thanks to Trump’s heavy last minute lobbying and his allies inside and outside the camera, the Chamber’s Republican Party did not need a single vote of the Democrats to approve the bill.
Bill backed by Trump to maintain the key obstacle financed by the Government
The president of the Mike Johnson Chamber Chamber, Republican of La-La-La. (AP Photo / J. Scott Applewhite)
A Democrat, Jared Golden de Maine, who represents a district carried by Trump in the last three presidential elections, voted for the Republican measure.
And the Republican who votes against the bill, the representative of the extreme right, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, is being threatened by Trump and his allies with a possible primary challenge next year when he is ready for re -election.
Click here to read what is on the full bill
Digital ads by The NRCCwhich are identical for all objectives, will be executed online in the districts of Democratic representatives Josh Harder (CA-09), Adam Gray (CA-13), Jim Costa, (CA-21), Raul Ruiz (CA-25), George Whitesides (CA-27), Derek Tran (CA-45), Dave Min (CA-47) and Mike Levin (CA-49) of California de California; Darren Soto (FL-09) and Jared Moskowitz (FL-23) from Florida; Eric Sorensen (IL-17) by Illinois; Frank Mrvan (IN-01) of Indiana; Kristen McDonald Rivet (MN-08) of Michigan; Don Davis (NC-01) of North Carolina; Chris Pupas (NH-01) and Maggie Goodland (NH-02) by New Hampshire; Josh Gottheimer (NJ-05) and Nellie Pou (NJ-09) of New Jersey; Gabe Vásquez (NM-02) from New Mexico; Dina Titus (NV-01), Susie Lee (NV-03) and Steven Horsford (NV-04) of Nevada; Tom Suzzi (NY-03), Laura Gillen (NY-04), Pat Ryan (NY-18) and Josh Riley (NY-19) of New York; Greg Landsman (OH-01), Marcy Kaptur (OH-09) and Emilia Syles (OH-13) of Ohio; Janelle Bynum (OR-05) from Oregon; Henry Cuellar (TX-28) and Vicente González (TX-34) of Texas; Eugene Vindman (VA-07) of Virginia; and Marie Struesenkamp Pérez (WA-03) of the state of Washington.
The NRCC says that there is a modest attachment of ads behind digital places.
“The Democrats of the House of Representatives made a tantrum at the expense of the American people, closing the government only to score political points. After months of failure, they have not learned anything and doubled their shameful dysfunction.” NRCC spokesman Mike Marinella said.
Democrats do not agree.
The leader of the minority of the House of Representatives, Hakeem Jeffries, Dn.y., center, flanked by representative Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., Left, and representative Katherine Clark, D-Mass Federal agencies financed until September 30, in La Capitol, at Washington, on Monday, the Republicans, 2025. (AP Photo / J. Scott Applewhite)
“The strong democratic vote of the House of Representatives in opposition to this project of reckless republican spending law speaks for himself,” the leader of the minority of the House of Representatives, Hakeem Chiefs of New York, the main democrat of the Chamber, after the vote told journalists.
Click to get the Fox News application
AND Democratic house The representative of Caucus, Pete Aguilar de California, pointed to what he called a “partisan” measure and emphasized that “we present a strong vote in the opposition of this bill because this harms families.”
