Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
NEWNow you can listen to Fox News articles!
It is not surprising that the Department of Education faces almost 50 percent of the strength reduction after Tuesday’s warning this week. Yes Department of Education It was a company that quotes in the stock market, its actions would be deceased, analysts would issue terrible warnings and shareholders would ask for the resignation of the CEO. Because? Because in the business world, companies that spend billions of dollars without achieving measurable success eventually collapse.
However, when it comes to government institutions, failure seems to have no consequences, except for taxpayers who take into account the bill. With the president Donald Trump Wanting to abolish the Department of Education, should this agency have been scam ago?
Almost half of the staff of the Department of Education to be eliminated
The problem of expenses of the Department of Education
Since its establishment in 1979, the Department of Education has shot a bureaucratic giant. In 2023, the department’s budget was approximately $ 79.6 billion, not including additional $ 120 billion in pandemic aid funds assigned to schools. Despite these astronomical figures, the performance of students in reading, mathematics and sciences have stagnated or decreased in the last two decades.
Linda McMahon was confirmed by the Senate to direct the Department of Education. (Getty images)
To put this in perspective, imagine that a company that is quoted in the stock market as Ford spent $ 200 billion in a few years, but did not see an increase in vehicle sales, or security improvements and there is no innovation in product design. Investors would flee, executives would be fired and the company would probably face great challenges from a shares price perspective on Wall Street. However, the Department of Education continues to spend excessively without achieving significant results and without absolutely any responsibility.
An instruction guide to dismantle the Department of Education
A ratings that fail
The National Evaluation of Educational Progress (NAEP), often known as the Nation’s Qualifications Ballot, constantly shows the performance of students. In 2022, mathematics and reading scores for 9 -year -old children fell to levels not seen in decades.
American students ranked 28 of the 37 OECD member countries in mathematics. Japanese students had the highest mathematics scores, and Colombian students obtained lower scores. The classification of the United States was similar in 2018, the last time the test was administered.
The average US score for mathematics fell into 13 percentage points between 2018 and 2022, but the United States was just to experience a decrease in scores. In fact, 25 of the 37 OECD countries saw at least a 10 points drop in the average mathematical scores of 2018 to 2022.
In science, The United States held 12th Of 37 OECD countries. Japanese students classified the highest and lowest classified students. The United States average science score was practically unchanged since 2018.
The Education Department has failed. It is time to let parents and states take the initiative
In all OECD countries, many less countries experienced a great decrease in science scores than in mathematics scores. Seven OECD countries saw their average scientific scores decrease by 10 points or more.
High school graduates are entering the university or workforce with less competence in basic subjects, and universities are forced to offer corrective courses to first year students. The return of investment is currently abysmal.
The bureaucratic nightmare
One of the greatest Problems with the Department of Education It is its great inefficiency. A significant part of your budget is used for administrative costs instead of directly benefiting students. The bureaucracy layers slow down progress, with funds that are channeled through federal programs, state agencies and local school districts before reaching a classroom. By the time the money reaches students and teachers, much has been absorbed by administrative overload.
Compare this with a company like Amazon. If Amazon experienced significant inefficiencies in its supply chain (delayed deliveries, wasted resources, excessive administrative costs, their leadership would act quickly to rationalize operations or run the risk of losing customers to competitors. In the case of the Department of Education, there is no competition, and taxpayers must pay the systemic inefficiency invoice.
The grades ticket of a nation that fails demonstrates the need for a scan change
No incentive for change
A company that quotes in the stock market must respond to shareholders. If the profits fall, changes must be made. But government agencies do not operate under the same rules. When the test scores decrease, instead of demanding reforms, policy formulators often advocate more funds, throwing good money after evil.
Consider the case of blockbuster. In the early 2000s, Blockbuster had the resources and recognition of the brand to dominate the entertainment industry at home. But instead of adapting to new trends, he continued to double his obsolete model and ignore the increase in transmission services such as Netflix. The result? Blockbuster ceased to exist.
The Department of EducationDespite his own failures, he is never at risk of being low because taxpayers finance him instead of voluntary investors.
Trump has the opportunity to get rid of our broken education system
What should be done?
If the Department of Education were a company, it would need to undergo complete restructuring or close completely. The private sector has demonstrated again and again that innovation and responsibility promote success. Education should not be different.
Here are some possible solutions:
Decentralization – The federal government must step back and allow local states and districts to take more control. Educational policies that work in one region may not be effective in another, and local governance allows greater adaptability.
Click here for more Fox News opinion
Choice and school competition – as well as competition in the free market leads to better products and services, competence in education – through School choiceCharter schools and coupon programs: they could boost innovation and improve students’ results.
Results -based financing – Instead of increasing budgets blindly, financing must be linked to measurable improvements in student performance. If a school district does not improve, you should not receive additional funds without implementing proven reforms.
Cut bureaucratic waste – The private sector constantly finds ways to optimize operations. The education system should not be different. Eliminating unnecessary administrative costs and redirecting funds to teachers and classrooms would have a direct impact on the success of students.
Click here to get the Fox News application
Does the Department of Education do an OPI?
If the Department of Education were a company that lies in the stock market, it would fail spectacularly and would go to an exclusion from the list: burn cash, not deliver results and lose public trust. However, unlike a failed business, it has an unlimited source of income in the form of taxpayers and there are no real consequences for low yield. Without serious reform, the only future it has is one of continuous failure.
It is time to adopt an education approach with business mentality: reduce waste, demand the results and introduce the real responsibility of the results that make us the best educational country in the world. Otherwise, the Department of Education, as we know it, will quickly have three cards in its tombstone … RIP.
