Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, said Friday South From Africa The ambassador to the US was no longer welcome in the country, while calling him a politician “who annuls the race” who hates the United States and President Donald Trump after he said that the commander in chief leads a global movement of white supremacists.
On Thursday, the South African ambassador, Embrahim Rasool, went to the Mapuungbwe’s Institute for Strategic Reflection (Mistra) in Johannesburg while explaining Trump’s opposition to the law of expropriation of his country and his anti-Israel positions.
He said that the Make America Great Again movement of Trump was a white supremacist response to demographic changes in the United States.
The South African ambassador to the Ebrahim Rasool of the United States goes to the City of Cabo Town Press in Cabo del Cabo, South Africa, on December 15, 2020. (Images Brenton Geach/Gallo through Getty Images)
“What Donald Trump is throwing is an assault on ownership, those who are in power, by mobilizing a supremacism against the headline, at home and, I think I have illustrated, also abroad,” he said. “Then, in terms of that, the supremacist assault against incumbency, we see it in the internal policy of the United States, the Maga Movement, the Make America Great Again movement, as an answer not only to a supremacist instinct, but of very clear data that show great demographic changes in the US 48% blank “.
Rubio, in an X post, criticized Rasool for his comments.
“The South Africa ambassador to the United States is no longer welcome in our great country.” The secretary saying. “Emrahim Rasool is a politician who annuls the career that hates the United States and hates @potus. We have nothing to discuss with him and, therefore, considers him a non -pleasant person.”
Trump has criticized South Africa by an land expropriation law that allows the government to make land seizures without compensation. In February, Trump issued an executive order that penalizes South Africa.
“In the shocking contempt for the rights of its citizens, the Republic of South Africa recently promulgated the 1324 expropriation law, to allow the South Africa government to seize the agricultural property of ethnic minorities Afrikaners without compensation,” the order establishes.
The Secretary of State Marco Rubio, on the left, listens when President Donald Trump offers comments during a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington, DC, on February 26. (Andrew Harnik/Getty images)
“It is the policy of the United States that, while South Africa continues, these unfair and immoral practices that damage our nation: (a) United States will not provide help or assistance to South Africa; and (b) United States will promote the resettlement of Afrikaner refugees that spit discrimination based on the breed registered by the Government, including confiscation of racially discriminatory property.”
The order also pointed to the position of South Africa. against Israelwho has accused in the International Court of Justice to commit genocide against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, as well as to revitalize their relations with Iran to develop commercial, military and nuclear arrangements.
“The United States cannot support the Commission of Violations of the Rights Commission of the Government of South Africa in its country or its undercutting of the United States foreign policy, which raises national security threats to our nation, our allies, our allies, our African partnersAnd our interests, “said the order.
The United States and South Africa flags are shown in the buildings of the Union in Pretoria, South Africa. (Stephane de Sakutin/AFP through Getty Images)
Click here to get the Fox News application
The South African government has claimed whites from all origins, not only to Afrikaners, who still have approximately 70% of the lands of South Africa. The Government is registered by saying that the Expropriation Law will only be used to take necessary land for public purposes, as for a new school, of people of any color when the owner refuses to sell, and even then there would be a “fair and equitable compensation.”
