Why the high Hamas-Israel fire has not had

Israeli combat aircraft unleashed a bombing wave through Gaza’s strip during the night, crawling into a fragile truce that has remained mostly since it entered into force in January.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during the night blamed Hamas’ door to the renewal of his mortal air campaign.

The declaration of the Israeli leader said that the military has received instructions to take “strong measures” against Hamas after their “repeated negative to free our hostages”, as well as their rejection of US proposals.

In the local press, Israeli military sources have also talked about seeing an increase in Hamas activity to regroup their forces in recent days.

Although the truce remained mainly until last night, the officials of the Hamas Ministry of Health in Gaza have said that Israel has killed more than 140 people in the two months since it entered into force in January.

In recent weeks, the Israel Army has said that it has repeatedly achieved objectives that have identified as Hamas fighters that represent a threat to their troops parked in Gaza.

But the reasons for the decision of Prime Minister Netanyahu to attack Hamas again is a containment issue.

The hostages and the missing families forum have accused the government of “a complete hoax” when they withdraw from an agreement “that could have taken everyone home.”

While some of Prime Minister’s firmer critics suggest that attacks are an attempt by Mr. Netyahu to distract from the harmful legal and political crises that faces home closer.

The most critical, there is a fundamental dispute between the Israeli and Hamas sides about who is to blame for the failure of recent efforts to progress in Alto El Fuego.

The top -of -the -age agreement of January 19 was expelled for many months, with the mediation of us, Qatar and Egyptian, and a detailed three -phase plan on how the fire should advance.

The first phase saw Hamas release 33 hostages in exchange for Israel to release about 1,900 Palestinian prisoners and allow the help and other goods to enter the Gaza Strip.

As the weapons shut up and thousands of displaced gacios returned home, Hamas and Israel had to begin negotiations to begin the second phase.

The parties had agreed that the negotiations of the second phase would include the release of all the remaining hostages, as well as a complete withdrawal of the Israeli forces of Gaza Strip, which leads to a permanent end of the war.

The first phase ended on March 1, but the negotiations for the next stage had not progressed.

Instead, Israel imposed a total detention in all the help that entered Gaza causing a generalized international alarm, and said it supported a new proposal created by the United States.

In Qatar last week, the Israeli and Hamas delegations met to negotiate how the fire and the American envoy Steve Witkoff would progress presented his new “bridge proposal” that would have extended the first expiration phase.

More hostages would return home in exchange for more Palestinian prisoners to be released, but, crucially, negotiations on a permanent end of the war would be delayed.

Here is a central element of why the truce has broken.

Israel’s two key goals, to return to hostages and defeat Hamas, cannot be achieved completely together.

Hamas, to put it crudely, has a letter to play in negotiations: hostages. They do not want to launch more hostages in the next stage of the high fire unless it implies the Israeli troops that begin to withdraw from the Gaza Strip, as remembered in the original fire.

Israel is resisting this. The new US proposal. It is an attempt to recover more hostages while delays a commitment to end the war and the question about whether Hamas will remain in some way.

In recent days, the United States and Israel have thrown Hamas’ preference for staying close to the terms of the Original fire agreement, instead of renegotiating their terms, as a “negative” to extend the high fire.

The American envoy Steve Witkoff accused Hamas of “publicly claiming flexibility while making demands in private that are not practices without a high permanent fire.”

Meanwhile, at the end of February, Israeli officials had already informed the local press that their military would not withdraw from the key sites in Gaza in a breach of the high fire agreement.

While we cannot know the details of the negotiation conversations that have taken place behind closed doors, what we do know is that Israel to stop the help that enters Gaza 17 days ago was an attempt to force Hamas to offer new concessions.

That has not worked until now and now it seems that Israel has returned to violence to try to extract a new agreement, one that is more favorable for its political leaders and that offers less victories to Hamas.

From now on, the situation in Gaza seems to be not seen as it has done in the last two months of truce.

This morning, the Israeli army has published a map, ordering the Palestinians to leave a huge area along the perimeter of the Gaza Strip, areas where thousands of gazanes had undoubtedly returned.

Hamas, on the other hand, has asked for the arrest of Israel’s military operation and, at the time of writing, has not been a unique attempt to force Hamas to grant at the negotiating table. However, you can also announce the beginning of a fierce wave of fights on the ground again, alarming the tired families of Gaza and the families of Israeli hostages equally. Aid to those who will return to the fighting.

However, a soldier told a BBC journalist near the border of Israel Gaza that a soldier has left for 40,000 reserves to the Israeli army to appear for the service. This seems to confirm the reports in the Israeli press that the army has been preparing for a renewed land invasion in the Gaza Strip.

The search for a renewed campaign in Gaza also presents a political blessing for Prime Minister Netanyahu. This morning, the hard party of Jewish power on the right has announced that it will return to the coalition, including former minister Itamar Ben Gvir, resigned in protest for the high fire. Having your cooperation will be crucial for the government, since it seeks to approve your current budget.

Israel’s operations may have been a unique attempt to force Hamas to admit at the negotiating table. However, you can also announce the beginning of a fierce wave of fights on the ground again, alarming the tired families of Gaza and the families of Israeli hostages equally.