EPA was illegal and whimsical

On Tuesday, the Federal Judge Environmental Protection Agency acted as a “arbitrary and whimsical” while terminating contracts with three non-profit. The judge ordered a temporary restriction that requires EPA and Citibank to enter funds in their non-profit rights.

This restrictive order Three nonprofits imported by the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund are part of three non-commercials, a part of inflation reduction He signed the law In 2022. EPA Citibank wanted to freeze accounts Concerns about concerns about waste, fraud and interest clashes. The judge found the “uncertain and unfounded” allegations of EPA.

EPA’s termination letters are called “uncertain reference” “multi-last research” and do not offer an individual explanation or individual explanation or individual explanation or an individual explanation for each (non-profit), “he said. “It’s not enough.”

The judge, who ordered the restriction of thinking, Columbia’s Columbia district will find “inevitable, irreparable damage” if the US District Court Tanya Chutkan, non-profit, financing.

One of the bidders will be developed by climate compounds, $ 392 million, $ 39 million and Oregon and AYS power plants in the Rural Archive Fund, including OREGON and Oregon and Aydakho $ 39 million, Oregon and Aydakho.

Another bidder, forward power, $ 539 million, without non-freezing of the donuts in their accounts, “Unable to pay outstanding invoices from contractors” left him.

Normally, EPA or any other state body sends a written notification to the action to cancel the contract and gives an opportunity for rewarding. In this case, non-profit organizations did not hear from EPA or Citibank before the plans are frozen. Instead, nonprofits did not leave the money in February and March, Citibank did not leave money and ignored the requests when asked. EPA also ignored non-profit.

Finally, EPA offered to meet with February 24 week week, but “rescheduled the meeting three times and then canceled without explanation.” EPA, in connection with non-profit funds did not send official termination letters, a while ago, a listening scheduled for the schedule.

However, this termination letter, “(non-profit”) interferes with the legal rights of these funds, and “Judge Chutkan” wrote.

“EPA … The legal steps needed to cancel these grants have taken the necessary steps due to their arbitrariness and whimsical actions.

The judge in the issuance of the restricted command, noting that non-profit non-profit, “the possibility of success.”