Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Justin Baldoni and Blake LivelyLawyers shoot each other over the proposal of Lively to release from a multimillion dollar It ends with us The director came against her.
Bryan Freedman described this step as “disgusting” and described it as “system abuse” through a statement issued Us every week on Thursday, March 20.
“The recent proposal of Mrs. Livela to release from the self -service disaster she launched is one of the most disgusting examples of abuse of our legal system,” he said through the statement. “Strict rules are introduced to the protection of innocent and allow individuals to rightly defend themselves. The laws should not be twisted and curators by privileged elites to suit their own personal agenda.”
He continued: “As we said yesterday in response to the same cowardly measures, Mr. Reynolds, we will continue to consider Mrs. Live responsible for her actions of pure anger, which include falsely accusing my clients for harassment and retaliation.
A spokesman for a living statement when Our He reached out to express himself.
“Late night restoration – a place of proposals for release – reveals that (Baldoni and defendants Wayfarer) know that they have no legal arguments remotely capable of rejecting our complaint,” Lively spokesman said Our on Friday, March 21. “Instead, they accepted that Mrs. Lively’s complaint states a valid legal assertion that they could not gather a single reason to reject. Meanwhile, every person and the Baldoni-wayfarer team moved to reject their insignificant PR stuker.”
Attorney Justin Baldoni Bryan Freedman fired to the response of Blake Lively for a judicial action of $ 400 million. “After my clients filed a comprehensive court packed with nearly 200 pages of undeniable facts and documentary evidence that crushed their false accusation of blur -blur by providing doctor communication to New York Times, Blake and…)
Earlier on Thursday, Live, 37, filed a proposal to dismiss the lawsuit, according to the documents they saw Our.
“This court is a profound abuse of a legal process that does not have a place in the Federal Court. The Californian law is now explicitly prohibiting sueing victims who decide to speak against sexual harassment or retaliation, whether in court proceedings or in the press,” lawyers lived Mike Gottlieb and Esra Hudson said Our in a statement.
The statement continued: “This insignificant and retaliatory court first leads three legal obstacles, including a lawsuit, fair news and the privileges of sexual harassment, the other, which contains mandatory transfer of fees that will be possible, and what is in other words will require to settle.” Mrs. Livela’s lawsuit “to forget” for them created only more responsibility and deservedly due to what they did. ”
Also said a spokesman for Lively Our, “The painful reality is that Mrs. Lively is not alone in the fact that she was sued for defamation after talking about sexual harassment at work. Protection and that there is a specific law that explicitly protects them from silence or financially destroyed by defamation because they had the courage to speak.”
Baldoni, 41, and alive were attached to the controversy Because they were in the film adaptation Colleen Hoover’s The best -selling novel, It ends with us.
Update: 1/7/24, 12:00 ET – Bryan Freedman, who is a lawyer Justin Baldoni, released the following statement in response to the Lively team: “It is painfully ironic that Blake Lively accuses Justin Baldoni of armaments when her own team organized this vicious attack by a preliminary document (…)
After the rumors spread that Baldoni and Lively could fight in August 2024 during the promotion of the film, the couple confirmed that hostility occurred at the opening of litigation.
In December 2024, Live accused the Baldoni Sexual harassment and start a campaign against her (Baldoni denies the accusations.)
Baldoni continued the file A judicial lawsuit of $ 400 million Against Livela, her husband, Ryan ReynoldsAnd her journalist in January, with quotation of defamation, among other things. The couple denied the accusations. Reynolds asked to dismiss the action In court documents obtained Our Tuesday 18th March.
