Victor Davis Hanson: Key questions about the signal psychodrama

As we learn the complete melodrama of the call Signal “scandal” to invite the editor of the Atlantic left to the left, Jeffrey Goldberg, a supposedly SAFE CONFERENCES LIST Involving Trump’s senior security officials, many questions must ask and answer.

The most important thing, who had the private number of Goldberg and inserted it, apparently by mistake, in the clear list of participants in the discussions? Why would Trump’s senior officials or their employees ever have the contact information of Goldberg, given their fairly public record of: a) Manufacture stories with unidentified sources YB) that suffer a decade of chronic Trump disorder syndrome?

Elon Musk took the opportunity to help lead the investigation into the signaling chat leakage

Questions for Goldberg: Did you know the mechanisms that had caused and continued their stealthy presence in safe discussions? Why did the citizen Goldberg not simply be clean as soon as he realized that he was included by mistake in the key communications of the National Security Conference, which he did not belong and, therefore, should it be obviously excluded immediately? Why did he hearly heard for almost two weeks? Was it the idea of ​​informing your hosts of your own inadequate presence too morally outdated?

Jeffrey Goldberg of Atlantic published an article that indicated that he was inadvertently invited to a Trump administration text group that discussed the White House plans to hit the hutis militants in Yemen. (Reuters)

Questions for posterity: Did Goldberg posted these discrete discussions really affected the mission in another completely successful way to neutralize years of aggression of the apacigated hutis and began to end their true destruction of the international maritime trade of the Red Sea? How was this error classified with the previous diplomatic and military screws, such as the Secretary of State of the Dean of the De facto Secretary of the Secretary of State 1950, excluding South Korea from the US umbrella, an omission that may have contributed to the South invasion of the south of June 1950? Was it comparable to Iraq Ambassador April Glaspie the security of Saddam Hussein that “we have no opinion about his Arab-Arab conflicts, as his dispute with Kuwait”, which may have caused his invasion of Kuwait in 1990?

President Obama was caught in a hot microphone that told Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that he would have “more flexibility” to deal with NATO missiles after his choice. (YouTube page of the capture/obama capture house)

Was it comparable to the “Microphic” Guarantee of March 2012 of President Obama for then Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that he would have “flexibility” in the antimiles defense of American Europe after his last election? Both maintained their promises: Obama foolishly dismantled the plans of Eastern Europe for anti -mile defense, and Russia postponed their previously planned invasion of Ukraine until 2014.

Was he classified with the former president of the General Chiefs, Mark Milley, secretly contacting his Chinese communist counterpart, Chinese general Li Zuocheng, to tell him that he would give the head to the leader of the People’s Liberation Army if he determined that President Donald Trump probably unleashed an existential war?

And just look who is intervening. There was Hillary Clinton, despite its illegal use of a private server to transmit classified information from the State Department and its subsequent destruction of communication devices with citation.

The former Secretary of State of the United States, Hillary Clinton, had a secret server in her basement where she sent and received classified emails. (Reuters/Alyssa pointer)

There was the Fabulista in series Susan Rice, who in 2012 lied to the nation in five news shows on Sunday, claiming that the terrorist attacks against the US consulate in Benghazi were “spontaneous” manifestations incited by anger by an anti-Muslim video. The Sergeant Fallaz of Ditto Rice. Bowe Bergdahl “Honor” The narrative and its lie about the elimination of Syrian weapons of mass destruction.

And why Leon Panetta would enter, when he was one of the alleged 51 intelligence authorities in 2020 who ridiculously said that the FBI authenticated laptop of Hunter Biden had all the characteristics of a Russian intelligence misinformation effort? That lie was designed to assemble Joe Biden before the last 2020 debate, and he could well have affected the elections.

In the end, this was a mistake, but also what on the left likes to call a “teaching moment. All similar conferences must be maintained in person or participants, they must be verified triple in a safe line. And perhaps the most important thing, all the designated ones of Trump and their employees do not know enough to have nothing to do with those who wake up every morning they wish In the advance.

This column was adapted from Victor Davis Hanson Publish in x.