Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Senator Alex Padilla, D-Calif., On the grill Kash Patel, president Donald Trump’s Nominated to direct the FBI, on Patel Pro-Armas positions.
Asked by Padilla if Patel believes that the background verifications in firearms purchases are constitutional during the confirmation hearing of the nominee on Thursday, Patel replied that he did not know “people in depth”, but believed “that is what he said the Supreme Court “.
“Do you think that the civil property of machine guns is protected by the Second amendment? “Padilla shot back.
“Whatever the government of the courts with respect to the second amendment is what is protected by the second amendment,” Patel replied.
Padilla explained that his interrogation line was due to an “association” between Patel and the owners of group weapons in America, which enthusiastically supported Trump’s choice to lead the FBI.
“Goa applauds to the ‘kash’ fiercely pro-gun ‘nomination for the director of the FBI,” said the organization in a press relief after Trump’s announcement to play Patel.
Kash Patel, Trump’s choice for FBI director, answers questions about January. 6, qanon and more
Padilla expressed concern about the enthusiastic endorsement, arguing that the organization has taken “extreme positions” in weapons.
“United States arms owners have taken extreme positions, including the position that all background verifications are unconstitutional and that the civil property of machine guns is protected under the second amendment,” said Padilla.
Padilla then argued that Patel would be responsible for supervising some of the most critical weapons regulations in the country. In the FBIexpressing his concern that Trump’s candidate was not up to the task.
Click here to get the Fox News application
“Let me remind you that, as director of the FBI, it will supervise the critical responsibilities related to the regulation of the firearm, it is administering the National Instant Criminal Verification System. Yes. Yes, it is constitutional, it is instead, for a reason !
“Given his hesitation, given his answers, I am worried about doing the job when he is not aligned with opinions such as United States arms owners.”