AI Starting Company sued for the alleged trademark violation

ConfusionAI-powered search products, enterprise-supported search products, were sued in the federal court allegedly violating another company’s trading brand.

One Complaint Thursday The northern district court of California, the northern district court, representing a company called an embarrassment, accuses confusion in violation of the rights of the brand “confusion”.

Portellexity Solved Solved Solved Solved Solved Texas-Texas Based Firm, established in 2017, registered Confusion trademark U.S. Patent and Trade Brand Office for Complaints (USPTO), October 2021.

Confugquatory solved resolution, primarily for the Video Career, including a video videotan, which meets HR analytics and confusion, sells a cooperation program for cooperation. The company has provided a brand registration until November 2022, 2022 and began to promote products on a domain website, where confused solutions were registered in 2021.

Tips for non-confusion and non-port solutions did not respond to press time. TechCrunch will update the article if you have both party comments.

Texas claims that the AI ​​starting confusion “AI-Pightsed” to promote the “or around” trading brand “or around” to violate the brand. The previous month – July 2022 – confusion, confusion, the domain of the domain, where the complaint was violated.

“A similar customer that reflects the” (and services “(and services” (and services “(and services” (and services “(and services” (and services “(and services” (and services “(and services” (and services “(and services” (and services “(and services” (and services “(and services” (and services “(and services” (and services) are very similar to “(and services). base. For example, confusion (solved solutions) ‘confusion match’ and the suspect ‘confusion gaps’ are both software platforms that facilitate communication and cooperation between colleagues in businesses. “

San Francisco-based AI Starting Confusion Gaps It started for enterprise customers In October, there are hubs with AI Assistant and connectors that can be customized to third-party platforms, applications and file systems.

The complaint claims “saturating” the “market”, including marketing throughout the various social media accounts. AI startup, according to the complaint, in September 2023, 2023, the acquisition of a commodity mark on September 2023, and instead, he preferred to file for his trading brand.

According to the complaint, the confusion was deprived of the advice of the decommissioned solutions, and the educator did not perform a letter, despite the efforts of the USPTO testing and the appellate council, he did not cancel his expected brand application.

For confusion, the lawyer is likely to be the confusion of the use of the confusion brand for resolved solutions.

“In fact, after the information and belief, consumers were already confused,” he said. “For example, in numerous cases, social media users have been ported” labeled “in their articles about the goods and services that are violated.”

The complaint claims that the laws of confusion, including Lanham Acco, violated the federal law regulating trading brands and unfair competitions. Among the other forms of legitimate relief, the confusion solutions, trademark, as well as the trademark, the trademark, which has a trademark of any domain and the brand of confusion, and wants to use a trademark and transfer property.

The most recent courtroom for the currently confusion is headache fighting the case News Corp’s Dow Jones and NY are presented with the post of NY as the bidders describe the “Content Kleptocracy”. There are many other news sites It was a concern This confusion is closely repeating their content – Only October, the New York Times filtered Stop starting and a letter.