Law of controversial lands in the judicial challenge

The Democratic Alliance (DA) presented a legal challenge against a new land seizure law in the center of a row before the president of the United States, Donald Trump, which is part of the South Africa coalition government.

The Expropriation Law It allows the government to incase private land without compensation in certain cases.

As a result, Trump has frozen foreign aid to the country, claiming that the land is already being confiscated.

The Government, composed of 10 parties led by the African National Congress (ANC), said that the actions of the president of the United States were based on “a campaign for misinformation and propaganda aimed at misrepresenting our great nation.”

The ANC was forced to a shared power agreement Last year after losing its parliamentary majority, for the first time in three decades, in the general elections of May.

The DA, which is the second largest party in the coalition, has described the unconstitutional expropriation law, arguing that no democratic government should receive powers to confiscate property without compensation.

He said that the president of South Africa, Cyril Ramaphosa, signed it against his council.

The property of the Earth has long been a controversial issue in South Africa, with most private culture lands owned by whites 30 years after the end of the racist system of apartheid.

There have been continuous calls for the government to address the agrarian reform and take care of the past injustices of racial segregation.

But in his argument against the Expropriation Law, the DA of the White majority says that the apartheid government used similar powers to eliminate the native communities of their lands, and that it wants to protect the property rights of all South Africans.

“This story teaches us that true repair requires the protection of property rights, ensuring that no government has had the powers of expropriation without control,” the party said in a statement.

In a statement last week, the prosecution said he was deeply concerned about Trump’s threat to stop the funds.

The ANC said that no land has not been seized without compensation and added that this would only happen in exceptional circumstances, as if land for public use and all other ways to acquire the land had been exhausted.

Trump’s executive order during the freezing weekend of the aid said that the United States “cannot support the violations of the violations of the South African government rights commission in your country.”

Also while South Africa “continue these unfair and immoral practices,” the United States will not provide help or assistance.

The White House said that Washington will also formulate a plan to reassure South African farmers and their families as refugees.

He said that US officials will take measures to prioritize humanitarian relief, including admission and resettlement through the United States Refugee Admission Program for Afrikaners in South Africa, which are mostly white descendants of the first Dutch and French settlers .

President Ramaphosa has said that he will send sent to several countries to explain the recent changes in government policy, including the Expropriation Law.