Google Play Books Procurement in IOS is now skirt from the App Store Commission

Google has gained permission to sell customers directly to customers directly to customers, electronic books and audiobooks. Today, iOS applications can offer access to the content purchased, previously purchased via a website, as purchased via a website, developers must require a special exception to connect users to its website.

According to a short post Google BlogUsers will now be able to press a new “Book” button on the Google Play Books IOS application, which will switch to Google Play Books, Google Play Books to complete the purchase of an e-book or audiobook.

From there, users will be able to see recently drop-down booklists and will be able to buy a purchase and save payment information using a Google account.

Avoid payment of the operation on its website, Google, digital content in-app’s in-app in-app purchases (usually 30%).

In addition, users of the iOS application will be able to share books with a family group to use Android, Android or Internet, as a family member using iOS, Android or Internet.

To allow this change, Google is initially applied, except for the exception of an external link account right Apple’s settlement with a Japanese regulator, In 2022, the Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC).

The rule focuses on “reader applications” – primarily designed to provide access to a kind of digital content such as magazines, books, sound, music or video. To make legal use, developers should want Additional approval When the external connection of the Apple and then the website of the website is formatted, how the connection is formatted, the application code is referred to and follow the other rules.

It also shows that the users have to see an operation warning with Apple with Apple after clicking the external link.

Netflix can sign up for a subscription that first accepts new rule in 2022 Website.

Google has not only explained that it is now decided to offer direct shopping, but Fortnite Maker can wait for the results of the claim between Epic Games and Apple.

In this case, it confirmed that there is no monopolist, but Apple has to allow applications to be closed to their websites if selected by voters. This The Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal In January 2024, the original judge left the sub-courts.