Elon Musk’s Doge Privacy Movement is to court: What you need to know

President Gerald Ford, President Gerald Ford, President Gerald Ford has seen months to eliminate the Privacy Law on December 31, 1974. The last months in Office, underlined “It is important to provide adequate and unit privacy guarantees for a wide amount of personal information collected and used in our Compress society.”

How does this apply today?

Doge’s critics, including democratic deputies, Federal Workers and Government Guard Groups – Government Guard Groups Young, controversial and seemingly polytheist workers Access to sensitive government information is a basic privacy violation. Events “represent the biggest and most suitable violation of personal information in the history of US” According to John DavissoAn attorney for the electronic privacy information center is one of the groups who have the court to prevent the entrance to the DoGe.

Trump leadership, meanwhile, this information of these information in the DOGE requires this information that the State Donald Trump’s diary allows you to remove wasters and removing architives. After a federal judge, the DOGE’s government payments, the spokesman for the White House temporarily prevented called the verdict “Absurd and the Field of Court”. Musk Targeted In X, “Now it should be impeachment!”

Could the Privacy Act stop the DoGe?

This will not agree with the arguments of a large number of judges to prevent the laws of the law not to prevent the sensitive information of the agencies.

The government claims that people can sue agencies under the Privacy Act only in one of the four scenarios: when an agency refuses to give up a record about someone; when an agency refuses to change one’s record as they require; When an agency fails to update someone’s record and encounter concrete damage such as refusing benefits; or an agency in another way, when they violate the requirements of the roads that have a negative impact on someone. The Judges’ Doge’s access to the information should be seen to determine that it has negatively affected people.

Agencies, DOGE’s Activity Law did not violate the “regular use” and “need to know” and “need to know.” In Court claim The Treasury Department responded to a legal call, the DOGE staff, the data, potential incorrect payments were reduced to the “regular use” as “the agency’s confidentiality act was required.

The power of this dispute is due to how the judges rose: Doge personnel, who are included in the information of each agency, are employees of these organizations, and whether the two exceptions are obtained and sharing.

Who is the use of a Privacy Act to Home DoGe?

Doge has at least eight court lawsuits against the Trump management on the federal data access, and all trusts at least partially in the privacy action.

1. American Government Workers Federation, Administrative Rights Association and more than 100 current and former federal workers The business department of Musk and Personnel Management claims that OPM’s illegal decision to perform the federal occupiers of the Doge Stafers, the Doge claims to make an illegal decision on the claim of “lack of legal and legal needs.”
2. Electronic Privacy Information CenterOn behalf of an unnamed federal worker, the DOGE and DOGE’s personal database and the Treasury payment system DOGE, the Treasury and Treasury’s area allegedly donated.
3. California Student Union University Student information claims to the process of conducted the education department, which has been transformed into non-language act languages, “Workers who need the records performing their duties.”
4. Six government, two non-profit groups and thinking Tank Economic Policy Institute Labor and Health and Human Services, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Doge, Welfare Complaints and Injury, including the Privacy Law of the Privacy Prompt ” “
5. Two Government Labor and Advocacy Group Union for retired Americans Americans are given to the treasury court allegedly to enter tax returns of Americans allegedly violating privacy The unique rules of the internal income service.
6. National Treasury Employee Union CFPB Director Russell’s actions, Russell, to provide information about CFPB staff, evaluate their status as “special government workers”, and thereby with the exception of the Privacy Act.
7. Nineteen state lawyer general The Doge claims that he was deprived of the treasury and treasury in connection with the federal payment systems, “(system) (system) is not the employees of the Treasury, but the confidentiality act.” “
8. Six Americans While giving tax returns, the Government requires disability benefits and requiring disability benefits to the government, the Government will sue the Treasury and the DOG.

Where do these situations stand?

In State AGS claim, A judge was quick Temporary restrictive order that restricts access to all treasure systems that store sensitive personal and financial information. Has been set for a permanent way for a different judge since work Make your order some after Trump management protested to restrictions on political purposes. A status meeting took place on February 14.

In epic boxThere is an organization asked the judge For a temporary restrictive order, access to certain treasure and OPM systems. A status meeting will be held on February 21.